Defective Takata air bags linked to tenth death

Defective Takata air bags linked to tenth death

February 2016 – Diane M. Zhang

On Jan. 15, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) linked a another auto death to a defective air bag manufactured by Takata Corp. and ordered automakers to recall 5 million additional vehicles. The auto accident—which involved a 2006 Ford Ranger—marks the tenth death linked to the exploding air bag defect, and the first to not involve a Honda-manufactured vehicle. As Trial News previously reported, Takata’s defective air bags have resulted in the recall of about 24 million vehicles to date. The most recent recall extends to Volkswagen and Mercedes-Benz, two previously unaffected manufacturers.

Joel Knight, 52, died last December when his Ford Ranger hit a cow on the road, causing his vehicle to crash into a fence. The air bag exploded and sent metal shards through Knight’s neck, killing him. Although the defect’s cause is still unknown, regulators suspect that the air bag’s ammonium nitrate propellant breaks down and combusts when exposed to prolonged moisture, causing the inflator—the metal casing surrounding the propellant—to fail and rupture.

Takata is the only major air bag manufacturer to use ammonium nitrate in air bag propellant, and the company has repeatedly claimed that the compound is safe when treated with a stabilizing agent. However, a consent order prohibits Takata from manufacturing and supplying ammonium nitrate inflators to companies after Dec. 31, 2018—or from entering into any new contracts for the inflators. The defective air bags also are at the center of an MDL before Judge Federico Moreno of the Southern District of Florida, who denied Honda’s and Takata’s motions to dismiss the class action last December. Currently, Honda and Takata also face approximately 20 personal injury cases pending in state courts across the country, most of which have joined together in a voluntary coalition to streamline litigation.

– See more at:

« Previous      Next »


Recognition held by some of our attorneys:

*No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. Before making your choice of attorney, you should give this matter careful thought. The selection of an attorney is an important decision. For the comparison standards employed by the various lawyer rating companies, please visit,,,,, and Award is conferred on at least 100 lawyers per state, not 100 lawyers in America. Prior Results do not guarantee a similar outcome, nor does visiting this website create an attorney client relationship.*

Tell Us About Your Case

Don’t hesitate. Don’t wonder. Don’t field questions from aggressive insurance companies. Contact Gill & Chamas, LLC today.

Contact Us

We serve clients throughout New Jersey

  • Woodbridge
  • New Brunswick
  • East Brunswick
  • Edison
  • North Brunswick
  • South Brunswick
  • Piscataway
  • Linden, Clark
  • Rahway
  • Middletown
  • Old Bridge
  • Sayreville
  • Perth Amboy
  • Elizabeth
  • Newark
  • Union
  • Middlesex County
  • Union County
  • Somerset County
  • Monmouth County
  • Mercer County
  • Hudson County
  • Bergen County
  • Ocean County
  • Atlantic County
  • Bergen County
  • Burlington County
  • Essex County
  • Mercer County
  • Middlesex County
  • Monmouth County
  • Ocean County
  • Passaic County
  • Somerset County
  • Sussex County
  • Union County
  • Warren County

Contact Us

655 N Florida Grove Road
Woodbridge, NJ 07095

3509 U.S. 9
Howell Township, NJ 07731

Phone: 732-324-7600
Fax: 732-324-7606