Medical Malpractice

$2.725 Million for Mother Wrongful Death: Post-Cesarean Complication

Wrongful Death – Post-Cesarean Complication Leading to Septic Shock
Settlement Amount: $2,725,000.00
Date of Settlement: First Day of Trial

Peter Chamas Peter Chamas recovered $2,725,000.00 on the first day of trial for the family of a woman who passed away fifteen days after delivering her first child via cesarean section. This medical malpractice case involved the death of a 31-year-old woman. The decedent had a significant prior surgical history, including bariatric surgery with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and several subsequent abdominal operations to address internal hernias and adhesions. These factors placed her at elevated risk for complications involving bowel obstruction and ischemia.

Following her cesarean section, the patient experienced progressively worsening back pain, rising white blood cell counts, and episodes of confusion. Despite these developments, a surgical consultation was not obtained until three days post-delivery when she began vomiting. Imaging at that point suggested a possible small bowel obstruction and possible vascular compromise. Emergency surgery revealed an internal hernia and signs of bowel ischemia. Over the next eleven days, the patient underwent multiple additional surgeries that revealed progressive bowel necrosis, enterotomies, and peritonitis. She died from septic shock on the fifteenth day post-op.

Plaintiff’s experts opined that both the obstetric and surgical teams deviated from the accepted standard of care.

The defense asserted that the patient’s abdominal examinations were largely benign (e.g., normal bowel sounds, no guarding or rigidity), and her pain presentation was more consistent with musculoskeletal or neurologic causes than surgical abdomen. Therefore, surgical intervention before imaging was not indicated based on clinical findings.

Resolution: The case was resolved for $2,725,000.00 on the morning of trial. The settlement reflected the complex medical issues, the prolonged suffering endured by the decedent, and the plaintiff’s contention that earlier surgical intervention and a more aggressive intraoperative approach could have prevented her death.

 



« Previous

    Stay up to date with Gill & Chamas

    The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. *

    Awards

    Recognition held by some of our attorneys:

    *No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. Before making your choice of attorney, you should give this matter careful thought. The selection of an attorney is an important decision. For the comparison standards employed by the various lawyer rating companies, please visit superlawyers.com, bestlawyers.com, milliondollaradvocates.com, law.com, avvo.com, and thenationaltriallawyers.org. Award is conferred on at least 100 lawyers per state, not 100 lawyers in America. Prior Results do not guarantee a similar outcome, nor does visiting this website create an attorney client relationship.*

    Tell Us About Your Case

    Don’t hesitate. Don’t wonder. Don’t field questions from aggressive insurance companies. Contact Gill & Chamas, LLC today.

    Contact Us

    We serve clients throughout New Jersey

    Townships
    Counties
    • Atlantic County
    • Bergen County
    • Burlington County
    • Essex County
    • Mercer County
    • Middlesex County
    • Monmouth County
    • Ocean County
    • Passaic County
    • Somerset County
    • Sussex County
    • Union County
    • Warren County

    Contact Us

    655 N Florida Grove Road
    Woodbridge, NJ 07095

    3509 U.S. 9
    Howell Township, NJ 07731

    Phone: 732-324-7600
    Fax: 732-324-7606